Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Far more than schooling...

The purpose of education is far more than schooling, it has to meet the needs of the whole child and young person.

And if we agree with that, then schools need to champion freedom to play.

Philosophical Reading list:
Sir Ken Robinson
Sue Palmer
Amiyata Sen

Explore the world of play theory...

Reports:
Best Play
Play for a Change
World Without Play

Play thinkers:
Bob Hughes
Tim Gill
Michael Follett
Wendy Russell

All will help you view the world you thought you knew from a completely different angle.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Loose Parts

The Theory of Loose Parts - taken from Svane Frode

The theory of “loose parts” first proposed by architect Simon Nicholson in the 1970's has begun to influence child-play experts and the people who design playspaces for children in a big way. Nicholson believed that it is the 'loose parts' in our environment that will empower our creativity. In a play, loose parts are materials that can be moved, carried, combined, redesigned, lined up, and taken apart and put back together in multiple ways. They are materials with no specific set of directions that can be used alone or combined with other materials. Loose parts can be natural or synthetic. In a preschool outdoor environment we can provide an array of loose parts for use in play such as stones, stumps, sand, gravel, fabric, twigs, wood, pallets, balls, buckets, baskets, crates, boxes, logs, stones, flowers, rope, tyres, balls, shells and seedpods. Having "loose parts" available in a playspace allows children to use these materials as they choose. Often you will find that children would rather play with materials that they can use and adapt as they please, rather than expensive pieces of play equipment. Encouraging children to use resources as they choose can provide a wider range of opportunities than one that is purely adult led. Children playing with loose parts are using more creativity and imagination and developing more skill and competence than they would playing with most modern plastic toys. It may take a very open mind on our part (there is often a lot of cleaning up involved as materials end up in places you would never expect them to be) but when children cross play materials and areas in creative ways, it is our responsibility to support and encourage their work and ideas. Loose Parts should –  Have no defined use and playworkers must support the children when they decide to change the shape or use of them.   Be accessible physically and stored where they can be reached by children without having to ask the playworkers.  The children should know that they can use them whenever and however they wish.   Be regularly replenished changed and added to.  ‘Loose parts’ theory is about remembering that the best play comes from things that allow children to play in many different ways and on many different levels.  Environments that include ‘loose parts’ are infinitely more stimulating and engaging that static ones.  The play environment needs to promote and support imaginative play though the provision of ‘loose parts’ in a way that doesn’t direct play and play opportunities, but allows children to develop their own ideas and explore their world.


The Theory of Loose Parts
Architect Simon Nicholson first proposed the theory of loose parts in the 1970’s at a time when adventure playgrounds in England were inspiring a rethinking the aged and static design of American playgrounds. Nicholson believed that the loose parts in an environment offer enormous possibilities and invite creativity unlikely in settings with fixed elements. Environments are richer places for children’s play with loose parts that include everything from sand and water to sticks, plastic crates and buckets, hoses, tubing, and more. I still have my worn mimeographed  (c. 1976) copy of Nicholson's Theory of Loose Parts on goldenrod paper in my archives. Recently the idea of loose parts has begun to catch on with early childhood educators, play experts, and playspace and museum designers.

… and Found Objects
I have an addition to make to Nicholson’s Theory of Loose parts. The best loose parts are objects children find and make their own. Travelling close to the ground, eyes wide open, and fingers outstretched, children notice, pick up, and become proud owners of dropped, discarded, and forgotten objects. Pebbles, sticks, plastic caps, pencil stubs, washers and slugs, wheels from toy cars, keys, and more become their treasures. Children store and stash them in pockets, backpacks, drawers, and ziplock bags where they can find them, use them, and re-use them in new ways. Just check the bottom of any child’s backpack.

When children find objects themselves, objects adults have dismissed or overlooked, they enjoy a feeling of ownership they seldom have about toys or school supplies given them by parents and other adults. No doubt they value their toy cars, doll suitcases, and paint brushes. But they have a special relationship with their own finds. They are the bosses of pencil stubs, empty thread spools, a rusty bolt, and seeds. They can collect, sort, trade, forget about, and even lose their found objects. They own them and they decide what to do with them. I imagine this is a sweet feeling of control for someone learning to share and understand rules of property.

An Openness to Objects
A child’s deliberate or casual search for found objects is a true child-directed activity, a goal often sought and less often realized. Their curiosity about and openness to the potential of materials extends their self-directed exploration. Sticky pine cones, a sparkly button, and a cork bobbing in water deliver first-hand information about the world. As children investigate an object, they wonder why it does “that”, where it came from, and what they can do with it. They have ideas. Children’s questions, imaginations, and previous experiences allow them to make connections, go further than the information given to them, and create something new and original for them.

Attractive, enticing, and beautiful, found objects have important attributes–fist sized, mobile, and undefined–that allow children to invent, follow, and finish an experience in personal and unexpected ways. An object can become anything a child wants it to be. Chestnuts can become cooking props, bricks in a dump truck, or boulders in an avalanche. Objects invite conversation and inspire stories; become game pieces, construction units, a puppet, or a precious addition to a collection of similar objects. Found items are not only interesting to children, but they stimulate children’s personal interests in rocks, vehicles, stories, tools, and tinkering. Loose parts and found objects lead children everywhere and anywhere on their ways to the future.

Time, Abundance and Variety
Children need time and opportunity to become fluent in materials. For most children, the more limited environments of their daily lives, the more limited their access to loose parts, and, especially, to found objects. Surely there are treasures to be found between car seat cushions on the way to school, but how do they compare to a daily 15-minute walk to and from school?

Hands-on museums do offer loose parts as props and tools in outdoor environments, and indoor exhibits and studio spaces. They can, nevertheless, give loose parts and found objects a much greater presence by spreading varied and abundant objects and their benefits across exhibits, throughout programs, and into public areas. Museums might just use some of the interest and imagination children bring to loose parts and found objects in doing this. They can also follow the work of educators from Reggio Emilia (IT), how some preschools and museums are exploring and adapting material exploration; and a few starting points below.

Grow the variety of loose parts and found objects. Start gathering! Loose parts can be natural and manufactured and can come from any room in the house or shelf in the garage; from the museum’s fabrication shop or food service vendor. Increase variety by inviting contributions from staff and board; work with local businesses and museum sponsors. As important as quantity is, interesting qualities (textures, shape, rigidity, color, finishes, etc.) are essential. Be selective; consider safety. Be a participant, exploring materials yourself and with other staff. Try a few materials in activities and notice children’s questions and how they use them. Search with new eyes.
  • Be on the look-out for: Spoons, keys, plastic caps, driftwood, beads, cord, paper rolls, ceramic tiles, wire, marbles, postage stamps, bark, shells, feathers, acorns, corks, knobs, s-hooks, puzzle and game pieces, buttons, rubber washers, ribbons, leaves, seeds, pods, etc.
Gather loose objects around a possible experience. A possible experience is somewhere between casually putting out a bunch of stuff and setting up a structured, supervised activity. Being both intentionaland open to possibilities of how children might explore, experience, use, and combine materials is a good starting place. A child may, or may not, use objects as you intend, but may follow another direction. Some objects might suggest making faces, others building towers, others creating symmetry. To shape a possible experience, imagine what a child might do with a set of objects: arrange, sort or seriate them; build with them or trade them; make up a story or make a game. 

Monday, March 5, 2012

Nothing can be taught.

This is a snippet from Anne Van Damm's blog that really spoke to me....

I remember listening to Emilia Gambetti who pointed out that "Everything you reach, you reach with your own thinking"... so how do I support my colleagues with reaching their own understandings about the power of play and the role of the teacher when play is at the heart of the daily experiences?

I am aware that the shift from 'teaching to learning' requires time, courage and commitment on the part of the teachers. Teachers need support as they are building understanding of learning through play. Some may experience tension as they question the possibility of meeting learner outcomes within a play-based learning programme.

Based on my own experience, I understand that children learn best through play. I know this and research confirms this. I have lived and breathed play all my life so I know it is a vital force in the lives of young children. Some teachers may believe they need to teach in order for children to learn. I believe it is important to communicate that true understanding is built through application. If teachers are not inclined to try, they will never change their point of view. Learner outcomes in the early years programmes are often broad enough to incorporate into the weekly planning. When teachers believe they have to 'teach' learner outcomes through planned activities (telling children what, when and how) they have not changed their practice. Learning is only true learning when it has been transformational and has translated into action.

Teachers have to engage in concentrated focused observations of children and think deeply about the choices they make regarding space, time, materials and relationships. It starts with reconstructing their image of the child. It is vital that teachers see the child (believe the child to be) a competent person and learner. This is the start of a new path in working alongside young children.

I strongly agree with Michelle Hill, a colleague, who wisely pointed that the implications of our new vision can't just be seen as pragmatic. It involves a dramatic shift in thinking. This shift is a result of the development of complex cognitive processes and skills. It all starts with 'listening'. Maybe the hardest part is letting go of the control over what and how children learn.


Transdisciplinary Skills: Teachers, what are we playing at?

The following is a post my previous PYP Co-ordinator posted after watching a movie I passed on to him.  Felt good to spur on action....even if it wasn't in my own school.

Chris wrote on the PYP Threads ning:

I don't know about you, but at our school we spend a lot of time planning, sequencing and designing activities to encourage kids to collaborate, make group decisions take risks and so forth. It is a lot of work I can tell you. The IB Learner Profile, PYP Attitudes and the skills of inquiry are increasingly taking up more and more meeting times. "Quite right too!" we say to ourselves - these elements are exceeding important! (I'm not denying the latter).

But are we focusing too much of our attention on the 'classroom' to promote these attributes when we should be taking a step back and looking more to nature and to the playground for our answers?

I urge you to take a reflective look at this video. Yes it is nostalgic, yes it is advocating play and yes we have probably heard this all before. But this time, look at the video through the lens of achieving the transdisciplinary skills, attitudes and learner profile. The UK school featured towards the end, has probably never heard of the IB, the PYP or The Learner Profile. But listen to the words they use when describing the benefits of play! This really got me thinking. Thank you Amber Jean Taylor (an ex colleague now in Moscow) for sending me this it spurred some though and has our staff debating.

Lost Adventures of Childhood
http://vimeo.com/36303926

I wish our staff would do the same.

There were replies to his post with some great videos:

http://pypthreads.ning.com/forum/topics/transdisciplinary-skills-teachers-what-are-we-playing-at?commentId=2012483%3AComment%3A47228&xg_source=msg_com_forum

Chris has also sent me a video with more of the same idea:

http://www.youtube.com/user/SchoolGroundsUK/featured

It's only play...

I think one of the biggest challenges with play-based learning is helping people understand what 'play-based' really means.  It does not mean 'free-for-all.'  It doesn't mean 'unstructured' and it certainly isn't a 'waste of time.'  I think teachers in play-based programs will agree that the materials we put out for children to play with are intentional.  Play in our classrooms always has a purpose.  When we are tuned-in to what children are playing, we can help extend their learning by asking that one question or making a suggestion that they might find too irresistible to pass up.  The writing, experimenting, observing and creating has meaning to them so IT IS IMPORTANT!  Then, theren are those serendipitous moments when the children take their learning in a direction you just didn't see coming and that's nothing less than magical!

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

A place to store all the many sites, nings, and blogs I follow and videos that inspire...

Videos:

Stuart Brown: Why Play is vital -- no matter your age

Lost Adventures of Childhood

Documentation: Transforming Our Perspective

Great Blogs and sites:

http://crayonswandsandbuildingblocks.wordpress.com/

http://earlylearningatiszl.blogspot.com/

http://pre-schoolplay.blogspot.com/

http://creativewithkids.com/

childrenandnature.ning.com

pypthreads.ning.com

http://www.teachingchannel.org/

http://www.outdoorplayandlearning.com/

http://www.letthechildrenplay.net/2013/03/be-reggio-inspired-top-pinterest-and.html

Articles:
If a child picks up a stick in a forest...
http://childrenandnature.ning.com/profiles/blogs/if-a-child-picks-up-a-stick-in-the-forest

What happens when we say 'yes' to children...
http://www.naeyc.org/tyc/article/unplanned-explorations-lively-minds

Forest play aids nursery children's mediation skills
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-17099694
 

Facebook Memberships:

     1) The Nature Nurture Project
     2) Learning for Life
     3) Creative With Kids
     4) Reggio Emilia Approach Interest Group
     5) Sightlines Initiative (UK Reggio)
     6) The Learning Caravan
     7) Pre-schoolplay
     8) The PYP and the Importance of Play
     9) PYP Xchange

Facebook administrator of Reggio Emilia Study Tour Oct 2011
   

My Two Cents Regarding Assessment in the PYP....


1) Conceptual Understanding in Early Years Children
Young children are different than us adults. They don’t celebrate their understandings like we do. It feels natural for them to find out and then, without the celebration, they connect and apply it further. Constantly. Naturally. Some at a slower/faster pace than others, but conceptual understanding is always present in children.
I like that we attempt to have prevailing concepts over our units and work hard to help children make concept connections in a transdisciplinary way, but this is impossible to force, in my opinion. A child does this naturally and I find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to assess. However, I find it easy to observe experiences that enable connections. Why can assessment not be simply observing in order to reflect on what has been learned and then use that to develop further or new understandings? Documentation.
2) Summative Assessments in the Early Years 
I find summative assessments baffling! In a similar way, it feels right to hold ourselves in the formative form of assessment all throughout the units (and our units do extend beyond the timed borders, overlap and spiral, but not officially!) We don’t have a task, but on-going observation instead.
Our summative assessment comes in the form of a rubric, which really is a continuum of sorts. Each unit has a four-columned continuum in which we lay out general educational objectives, or hypotheses of what learning could happen on the basis of our knowledge of the children and of our previous experiences. Along with Reggio-styled documentation of the engagements throughout the unit, the rubric/continuum keeps us connected to the central idea and lines of inquiry, and to each other as separate classrooms with shared but somewhat varied expressions of the unit. We also have space at the bottom of the rubric/continuum for anecdotal documentation of learner profile traits, attitudes, and action that the children have displayed throughout the unit. Parental observations are included too.
Since observation and documentation of the groups’ learning is a clear way to record understanding, these documents naturally fit into each child’s portfolio. The unit rubric/continuum does too. We keep record of their growth of understanding of unit concepts by revisiting earlier units’ continuums, and hopefully, by the end of the year, the children have progressed through the columns.
3) Central Ideas and Reggio Projects
The PYP is already Reggio inspired. It was in conception, from what I understand.
As I see it, the units in early years are vehicles for understanding. It seems that in order to avoid restriction because of the planners, we open up our Central Ideas. We try to make them broad and meaningful to children. This has worked for us, developing units that hopefully help us to observe scientific method, while creating provocations in our environment with social-constructivism in mind. I am not opposed to having the Central Idea and Lines of Inquiry because these help keep a team of teachers, children and the big players that we often forget about, parents, connected. I also think that in international schools, we get a lot of movement of teachers in and out of the Early Years. Removing Central Ideas and developing topics or projects, as suggested above, puts a lot of responsibility on the educators who may not have the experience or the confidence needed to respectfully listen to the children and develop projects.
Freezing but sunny in Moscow,
Amber

Lost Adventures of Childhood

I found the most amazing movie about the importance of Free Play in childhood. 

Lost Adventures of Childhood

Makes me rethink everything about my life in ways....how I teach, how I raise my child, what changes I may need to make in my life to help my son have the play space that he needs. 

This movie has also helped me to feel confident and proud of my teaching esthetic.  I need to keep passing it on.

There is no going back now...